4.5 Article

Full shift arm inclinometry among dairy parlor workers: A feasibility study in a challenging work environment

Journal

APPLIED ERGONOMICS
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 604-613

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.09.007

Keywords

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders; Exposure assessment; Agriculture

Funding

  1. High Plains Intermountain Center for Agricultural Health and Safety (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) [U50/OH008085]
  2. High Plains and Intermountain Center for Agricultural Health and Safety (HICAHS)
  3. Southwest Center for Agricultural Health, Injury Prevention, and Education (SWAG)
  4. Great Plains Center for Agricultural Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the last 20 years, the US dairy industry has experienced a significant transformation from small farm operations to an industrialization of the milking process. This transformation has resulted in improvements in process efficiency and product quality. Milking tasks in large-herd parlors are highly-repetitive involving awkward postures and high muscle loads of the upper extremity. Field-based direct measures of physical exposures have been limited in challenging work settings such as dairies. This study evaluated full-shift exposures of posture and motion of the upper extremity among large-herd parlor milkers using wireless inclinometry. Results suggest large-herd parlor workers may be exposed to high exposure levels (posture, movement velocity, repetition, and inadequate rest) associated with the development of shoulder pathology. Compared to other high-risk occupations involving shoulder-intensive work, parlor workers may have higher exposure levels. These findings warrant the need for continued field-based research with larger sample sizes to facilitate the development of cost-effective intervention strategies. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available