4.1 Article

Preliminary evaluation of greenhouses employing positive-pressure forced ventilation to prevent invasion by insect pests

Journal

APPLIED ENTOMOLOGY AND ZOOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 4, Pages 553-559

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s13355-014-0285-8

Keywords

Bemisia tabaci; Liriomyza sativae; Thrips tabaci; Tomato yellow leaf curl virus

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We conducted a preliminary comparison of greenhouses using positive-pressure forced ventilation (PFV) systems and natural ventilation (NV) systems, and assessed the effectiveness of both systems for preventing the invasion of greenhouses used to cultivate tomatoes by insect pests. In Trial 1 (August-December 2006), greenhouses using a PFV system and an insect-proof screen (mesh size 1.0 mm) had fewer sweetpotato whiteflies and Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), and more onion thrips, Thrips tabaci (Lindeman), than greenhouses that employed an NV system fitted with the same screen. Tomato leafminers, Liriomyza sativae Blanchard, were not observed in the greenhouse using the PFV system, but some were observed in the greenhouse using the NV system. In Trial 2 (August-December 2007), the greenhouse using the PFV system combined with an insect-proof screen (mesh size 0.4 mm) had higher whitefly densities after late October compared to the greenhouse using the NV system and the same screen. However, there were more thrips in the greenhouse using the PFV system compared to the greenhouse using the NV system. In both trials, Tomato yellow leaf curl virus, which is transmitted by B. tabaci, was recorded in the greenhouse using the NV system but not in the greenhouse using the PFV system. The results showed that the PFV system was effective for preventing invasion by leafminers and partially effective for preventing invasion by whiteflies, but not effective for preventing invasion by thrips.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available