4.4 Article

Low-Velocity Impact Response and Finite Element Analysis of Four-Step 3-D Braided Composites

Journal

APPLIED COMPOSITE MATERIALS
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 397-413

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10443-012-9279-2

Keywords

3-D braided composites; Low-velocity impact; Unit cell model; Finite element analysis; Impact response behaviors

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [11072058]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Education [309014]
  3. Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of PR China (FANEDD) [201056]
  4. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [11QH1400100]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The low-velocity impact characters of 3-D braided carbon/epoxy composites were investigated from experimental and finite element simulation approaches. The quasi-static tests were carried out at a constant velocity of 2 mm/min on MTS 810.23 material tester system to obtain the indentation load-displacement curves and indentation damages. The low-velocity tests were conducted at the velocities from 1 m/s to 6 m/s (corresponding to the impact energy from 3.22 J to 116 J) on Instron Dynatup 9250 impact tester. The peak force, energy for peak force, time to peak force, and total energy absorption were obtained to determine the impact responses of 3-D braided composites. A unit cell model was established according to the microstructure of 3-D braided composites to derive the constitutive equation. Based on the model, a user-defined material subroutine (VUMAT) has been compiled by FORTRAN and connected with commercial finite element code ABAQUS/Explicit to calculate the impact damage. The unit cell model successfully predicted the impact response of 3-D braided composites. Furthermore, the stress wave propagation and failure mechanisms have been revealed from the finite element simulation results and ultimate damage morphologies of specimens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available