4.5 Article

Synergistic effect of an ultraviolet feeding cue for an avian repellent and protection of agricultural crops

Journal

APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE
Volume 159, Issue -, Pages 107-113

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.06.012

Keywords

Agelaius phoeniceus; Anthraquinone; Chemical repellent; Feeding behavior; Postingestive consequence; Visual cue

Funding

  1. National Sunflower Association (Mandan, ND, USA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Application strategies for avian repellents are needed to maintain efficacious repellent concentrations throughout the period of needed crop protection. We investigated the repellency of an ultraviolet (UV) feeding cue in the absence of postingestive consequences, the combination of the UV feeding cue and an UV-absorbent, postingestive repellent (i.e., a repellent that causes negative postingestive consequences), and a non-UV feeding cue combined with the IN-absorbent, postingestive repellent in red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). In the absence of negative postingestive consequences, 0.2% of the UV feeding cue (wt/wt) was not aversive relative to untreated food (i.e., baseline preference test; P=0.1732). Relative to the repellency of food treated only with the anthraquinone-based repellent, synergistic repellency (i.e., 45-115% increase) was observed when 0.2% of the UV feeding cue was combined with 0.02% or 0.035% anthraquinone (wt/wt). In contrast, <10% repellency was observed for 0.2% of a non-UV feeding cue (red #40 aluminum lake dispersion) paired with 0.02% anthraquinone. Aversion performance was therefore not attributed to characteristics of either conditioned or unconditioned stimuli but their combinations, and enhanced repellency of anthraquinone plus the UV-absorbent cue was attributed to UV wavelengths. Thus, the addition of an UV feeding cue can enhance avian repellency at repellent concentrations realized from previous field applications on agricultural crops (e.g., <= 1000 ppm anthraquinone). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available