4.5 Review

The long and short of it: A review of tail docking in farm animals

Journal

APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE
Volume 135, Issue 3, Pages 179-191

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.015

Keywords

Cattle; Pain; Pig; Sheep; Tail docking

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tail docking involves amputating a portion of the tail for a variety of reasons. We review the scientific evidence for the rationale for tail docking, a description of the different methods used, the pain response to the procedure and the effectiveness of pain alleviation, and, finally, the alternatives to tail docking and policy regarding the practice. We focus on the three main agricultural species that are tail docked as a management practice: pigs, sheep. and dairy cattle. Methods of tail docking include cutting with a knife or scalpel, cutting with a hot docking iron, or application of a constrictive rubber ring. All methods are commonly performed without analgesia or anaesthesia, and all likely result in some degree of pain. As with any procedure that alters the integrity of an animal, it is important to consider the rationale behind docking in order to evaluate if it is necessary. Tail docking in pigs is routinely conducted on commercial swine farms because it can reduce the incidence of tail biting, an injurious and undesirable behaviour. Both behavioural and physiological changes indicate that tail docking is painful in pigs, but until robust and consistent methods for preventing tail biting are identified, this procedure is likely to continue as a management practice. This approach is reflected in public policy about the procedure. There is both behavioural and physiological evidence that tail docking is painful for sheep; both responses are reduced when pain relief is provided. Prevention of fly strike is the primary reason given for tail docking sheep, but the scientific evidence to support this rationale is surprisingly sparse. Further research is required to justify tail docking of sheep as a routine practice. Dairy cattle are docked because this practice is thought to improve cow cleanliness and udder health, however, there is no scientific evidence supporting this rationale, Tail docking cattle results in relatively few behavioural or physiological indicators of pain, but docked cows are unable to effectively remove flies from their hind end. The practice of tail docking dairy cattle is banned, discouraged or declining in most industrialized countries except the US. The long-term pain associated with tail docking is not well understood in pigs, sheep or cattle. In cases where tail docking may be justified by demonstrated benefits for the animal (possibly in case of pigs and sheep), further research is needed to find either practical alternatives or ways to alleviate the pain associated with this procedure. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Effects of 3 surface types on dairy cattle behavior, preference, and hygiene

K. E. Schutz, V. M. Cave, N. R. Cox, F. J. Huddart, C. B. Tucker

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2019)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Cooling cows with sprinklers: Effects of soaker flow rate and timing on behavioral and physiological responses to heat load and production

Grazyne Tresoldi, Karin E. Schutz, Cassandra B. Tucker

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2019)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Effect of Morphine Administration on Social and Non-Social Play Behaviour in Calves

Mhairi Sutherland, Gemma Worth, Catherine Cameron, Else Verbeek

ANIMALS (2019)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Stress-Induced Immunomodulation in Low and High Reactive Sheep

Mhairi Sutherland, Suzanne Dowling, Richard Shaw, Jackie Hickey, Diane Fraser, Catherine Cameron, Ian Sutherland

ANIMALS (2019)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Infrared Thermography-A Non-Invasive Method of Measuring Respiration Rate in Calves

Gemma Lowe, Mhairi Sutherland, Joe Waas, Allan Schaefer, Neil Cox, Mairi Stewart

ANIMALS (2019)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Sensitivity and wound healing after hot-iron disbudding in goat kids

Lorenzo Alvarez, Sarah J. J. Adcock, Cassandra B. Tucker

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2019)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Conditioned place preference reveals ongoing pain in calves 3 weeks after disbudding

Sarah J. J. Adcock, Cassandra B. Tucker

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2020)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Automated Collection and Analysis of Infrared Thermograms for Measuring Eye and Cheek Temperatures in Calves

Gemma Lowe, Brendan McCane, Mhairi Sutherland, Joe Waas, Allan Schaefer, Neil Cox, Mairi Stewart

ANIMALS (2020)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Evaluation of infrared thermography as a non-invasive method of measuring the autonomic nervous response in sheep

Mhairi A. Sutherland, Gemma M. Worth, Suzanne K. Dowling, Gemma L. Lowe, Vanessa M. Cave, Mairi Stewart

PLOS ONE (2020)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Can Isoflurane and Meloxicam Mitigate Pain Associated with Cautery Disbudding of 3-Week-Old Goat Kids?

Melissa N. Hempstead, Joseph R. Waas, Mairi Stewart, Vanessa M. Cave, Mhairi A. Sutherland

ANIMALS (2020)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Innovative cooling strategies: Dairy cow responses and water and energy use

Alycia M. Drwencke, Grazyne Tresoldi, Matthew M. Stevens, Vinod Narayanan, Angelica Carrazco, Frank M. Mitloehner, Theresa E. Pistochini, Cassandra B. Tucker

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2020)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Sampling strategy and measurement device affect vaginal temperature outcomes in lactating dairy cattle

Grazyne Tresoldi, Karin E. Schuetz, Cassandra B. Tucker

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2020)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Effects of provision of drinking water on the behavior and growth rate of group-housed calves with different milk allowances

G. L. Lowe, M. A. Sutherland, M. Stewart, J. R. Waas, N. R. Cox, E. Schutz

Summary: This study investigated the effects of water provision and milk allowance on the behavior and growth of calves. The results suggest that calves should have free access to drinking water from birth, and that access to water may aid in hay intake and rumen development.

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2022)

Article Veterinary Sciences

Clove Oil Delays Rather Than Prevents Scur/Horn Growth in Dairy Cattle

Mhairi Sutherland, Alan Julian, Frances Huddart

VETERINARY SCIENCES (2019)

Article Veterinary Sciences

Culling Decisions and Dairy Cattle Welfare During Transport to Slaughter in the United States

Lily N. Edwards-Callaway, Jennifer Walker, Cassandra B. Tucker

FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE (2019)

No Data Available