4.3 Article

Identification of up-regulated proteins potentially involved in the antagonism mechanism of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens G1

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10482-013-9902-8

Keywords

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; Antagonism mechanism; Proteomics; Up-regulated proteins

Categories

Funding

  1. Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System [CARS-46]
  2. National 863 program [2011AA10A216]
  3. Special Fund for Agroscientific Research in the Public Interest [201203085]
  4. Science and Technology Project of Lianyungang [CG1137]
  5. Jiangsu Science and Technology Support Program, Shanghai University Knowledge Service Platform

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of Bacillus probiotics has been demonstrated as a promising method in the biocontrol of bacterial diseases in aquaculture. However, the molecular antibacterial mechanism of Bacillus still remains unclear. In order to explore the antibacterial mechanism of the potential antagonistic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain G1, comparative proteomics between B. amyloliquefaciens strain G1 and its non-antagonistic mutant strain was investigated. The 2-dimensional electrophoresis gel maps of their total extracted proteins were described and 42 different proteins were found to be highly expressed in strain G1 in comparison with those in the mutant strain. 35 of these up-regulated proteins were successfully identified using MALDI-TOF-TOF MS and databank analysis, and their biological functions were analyzed through the KEGG database. The increased expression of these proteins suggested that high levels of energy metabolism, biosynthesis and stress resistance could play important roles in strain G1's antagonism. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the proteins involved in the antagonism mechanism of B. amyloliquefaciens using a proteomic approach and the proteomic data also contribute to a better understanding of the molecular basis for the antagonism of B. amyloliquefaciens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available