4.3 Article

FIB-SEM investigation of trapped intermetallic particles in anodic oxide films on AA1050 aluminium

Journal

ANTI-CORROSION METHODS AND MATERIALS
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages 173-178

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED
DOI: 10.1108/00035591111148885

Keywords

Anodic protection; Anodizing; AA1050; Intermetallic particle; FIB-SEM; Oxides; Organometallic compounds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of this investigation is to understand the structure of trapped intermetallics particles and localized composition changes in the anodized anodic oxide film on AA1050 aluminium substrates. Design/methodology/approach - The morphology and composition of Fe-containing intermetallic particles incorporated into the anodic oxide films on industrially pure aluminium (AA1050, 99.5 per cent) has been investigated. AM 050 aluminium was anodized in a 100 ml/l sulphuric acid bath with an applied voltage of 14 V at 20 degrees C +/- 2 degrees C for 10 or 120 min. The anodic film subsequently was analyzed using focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM), SEM, and EDX. Findings - The intermetallic particles in the substrate material consisted of Fe or both Fe and Si with two different structures: irregular and round shaped. FIB-SEM cross-sectioned images revealed that the irregular-shaped particles were embedded in the anodic oxide film as a thin strip structure and located near the top surface of the film, whereas the round-shaped particles were trapped in the film with a spherical structure, but partially dissolved and were located throughout the thickness of the anodic film. The Fe/Si ratio of the intermetallic particles decreased after anodizing. Originality/value - This paper shows that dual beam FIB-SEM seems to be an easy, less time consuming and useful method to characterize the cross-sectioned intermetallic particles incorporated in anodic film on aluminium.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available