4.7 Review

Statistical review: frequently given comments

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages 323-325

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206186

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

From 2006 to 2014, I have carried out approximately 200 statistical reviews of manuscripts for ARD. My most frequent review comments concern the following: 1. Report how missing data were handled. 2. Limit the number of covariates in regression analyses. 3. Do not use stepwise selection of covariates. 4. Use analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to adjust for baseline values in randomised controlled trials. 5. Do not use ANCOVA to adjust for baseline values in observational studies. 6. Dichotomising a continuous variable: a bad idea. 7. Student's t test is better than non-parametric tests. 8. Do not use Yates' continuity correction. 9. Mean (SD) is also relevant for non-normally distributed data. 10. Report estimate, CI and (possibly) p value-in that order of importance. 11. Post hoc power calculations-do not do it. 12. Do not test for baseline imbalances in a randomised controlled trial. 13. Report actual p values with 2 digits, maximum 3 decimals. 14. Format for reporting CIs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available