4.7 Article

Abatacept in subjects who switch from intravenous to subcutaneous therapy: results from the phase IIIb ATTUNE study

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages 857-861

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200355

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  2. Abbott Laboratories
  3. AstraZeneca Pharma
  4. Biotest
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
  6. Centocor, Inc
  7. F Hoffmann-La Roche Inc
  8. Genentech Inc
  9. Merck
  10. Nycomed
  11. Pfizer Pharmaceuticals
  12. UCB
  13. Amgen Inc
  14. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
  15. Genzyme
  16. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  17. Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc
  18. Genentech
  19. Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc
  20. Merck Pharmaceuticals
  21. Ortho Biotech Products L P
  22. Pfizer Inc
  23. Roche
  24. UCB, Inc
  25. Human Genome Sciences, Inc
  26. Ortho Biotech Products LP
  27. Roche Diagnostics
  28. GlaxoSmithKline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To assess safety, immunogenicity and efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients switched from long-term intravenous to subcutaneous (SC) abatacept. Methods In this phase IIIb, open-label, single-arm trial, patients who completed >= 4 years of intravenous abatacept (in long-term extensions of two phase III studies) were enrolled to receive SC abatacept (125 mg/week). The primary objective was safety during the first 3 months after switching from intravenous therapy. Results 123 patients entered the study (mean Disease Activity Score 28 (based on C reactive protein) and HAQ-DI of 3.4 and 0.94, respectively). At month 3, 120 (97.6%) patients were continuing to receive SC abatacept; no patients discontinued due to lack of efficacy. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 49 (39.8%) patients through month 3. One patient (0.8%) discontinued due to an AE and one patient (0.8%) experienced a serious AE. Two (1.6%) patients had SC injection site reactions (erythema, pain), both with mild intensity. Clinical efficacy was maintained throughout. Limited impact on immunogenicity was observed when switching routes of administration. Conclusion These data demonstrate that patients can switch from long-term monthly intravenous abatacept to a weekly fixed dose of 125 mg SC abatacept with no increased safety concerns. This study further supports SC abatacept as an alternative treatment option for patients with RA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available