4.7 Article

High Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio Persistent During First-line Chemotherapy Predicts Poor Clinical Outcome in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Cancer

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 1377-1384

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4097-4

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an index of systemic inflammation, is associated with poor outcome for various types of cancers. We assessed the role on outcome prediction of NLR at baseline and persistent during first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial cancer. We retrospectively reviewed 292 patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy between January 2003 and December 2012. The cutoff values of NLR (> 3 vs. < 3) were evaluated before therapy and at day 1 of the second and third cycle (follow-up NLR). After univariate analysis, a multivariate analysis was carried out by Cox regression model and included the following variables: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (a parts per thousand yen2 vs. 0-1), visceral disease (present vs. absent), hemoglobin (< 12 g/dL vs. > 12 g/dL), pretherapy NLR (> 3 vs. < 3), and follow-up NLR (> 3 vs. a parts per thousand currency sign3). Patients with pre- and follow-up NLR of > 3 had a median progression-free survival of 3.2 months and a median overall survival of 5.7 months. In multivariate analysis, visceral metastases, pretherapy hemoglobin, and follow-up NLR were significant predictors of progression-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.75, P = 0.0001; HR 1.57, P = 0.0015; HR 2.77, P < 0.0001, respectively], and of overall survival (HR 1.60, P = 0.0023; HR 1.59, P = 0.0024; HR 2.89, P < 0.0001, respectively); whereas pretherapy NLR remained as predictor of overall survival only (HR 1.53, P = 0.0101). An increased NLR persistent during first-line chemotherapy is an independent predictive factor for patients with advanced urothelial cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available