4.7 Article

A Novel Animal Model for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 866-873

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4174-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01CA109294, T32CA148062]
  2. NIH [T32CA148062]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) poses complex management issues due to failure of response to chemotherapy and progression to local complications such as skin erosion, superinfection, and lymphedema. Most cell line and animal models are not adequate to study LABC. Methods. A patient-derived xenograft (IOWA-1T) from a patient with LABC was characterized for expression profile, short tandem repeat profile, oncogenic mutations, xenograft growth, and response to therapy. Results. Short tandem repeat profile authenticated the cell line as derived from a human woman. The primary tumor and derived xenografts were weakly estrogen receptor alpha positive (<5 %), progesterone receptor negative, and HER2 nonamplified. Expression array profile compared to MCF-7 and BT-549 cell lines indicate that IOWA-1T was more closely related to basal breast cancer. IOWA-1T harbors a homozygous R248Q mutation of the TP53 gene; in vitro invasion assay was comparable to BT-549 and greater than MCF-7. IOWA-1T xenografts developed palpable tumors in 9.6 +/- 1.6 days, compared to 49 +/- 13 days for parallel experiments with BT-20 cells (p<0.002). Tumor xenografts became locally advanced, growing to >2 cm in 21.6 +/- 2 days, characterized by skin erosion necessitating euthanasia. The SUMO inhibitor anacardic acid inhibited the outgrowth of IOWA-1T xenografts, while doxorubicin had no effect on tumorigenesis. Conclusions. IOWA-1T is a novel cell line with an expression pattern consistent with basal breast cancer. Xenografts recapitulated LABC and provide a novel model for testing therapeutic drugs that may be effective in cases resistant to conventional chemotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available