4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Tell me Dave: Context-sensitive grounding of natural language to manipulation instructions

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH
Volume 35, Issue 1-3, Pages 281-300

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0278364915602060

Keywords

Natural language understanding; machine learning; human-robot interaction and crowd-sourcing

Categories

Funding

  1. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1426744] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is important for a robot to be able to interpret natural language commands given by a human. In this paper, we consider performing a sequence of mobile manipulation tasks with instructions described in natural language. Given a new environment, even a simple task such as boiling water would be performed quite differently depending on the presence, location and state of the objects. We start by collecting a dataset of task descriptions in free-form natural language and the corresponding grounded task-logs of the tasks performed in an online robot simulator. We then build a library of verb-environment instructions that represents the possible instructions for each verb in that environment, these may or may not be valid for a different environment and task context. We present a model that takes into account the variations in natural language and ambiguities in grounding them to robotic instructions with appropriate environment context and task constraints. Our model also handles incomplete or noisy natural language instructions. It is based on an energy function that encodes such properties in a form isomorphic to a conditional random field. We evaluate our model on tasks given in a robotic simulator and show that it successfully outperforms the state of the art with 61.8% accuracy. We also demonstrate a grounded robotic instruction sequence on a PR2 robot using the Learning from Demonstration approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available