4.0 Article

Audioprofile-Directed Successful Mutation Analysis in a DFNA2/KCNQ4 (p.Leu274His) Family

Journal

ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY
Volume 120, Issue 4, Pages 243-248

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/000348941112000405

Keywords

age-related typical audiogram; AudioGene; audioprofile; DFNA2; genetic hearing loss; KCNQ4

Funding

  1. Heinsius Houbolt Foundation
  2. RNID
  3. Fonds NutsOhra

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: We undertook to show that in a family with nonsyndromic autosomal dominant sensorineural hearing loss, genetic analysis can be successful when there is a match with a specific DFNA audioprofile. We also provide an update of relevant DFNA2/KCNQ4 audioprofiles and report the results of automatic audioprofile analysts using the Internet program AudioGene. Methods: Audiometric data and blood samples were obtained from the family W08-0384. Based on the audiograms of the affected participants, mutation analysis of KCNQ4 was started. Original audiometric threshold data were collected for all identified KCNQ4-related DFNA2 families. The Internet computer program AudioGene, recently developed for automatic audioprofile analysis, was accessed. Results: The family's audioprofile and the program AudioGene predicted the DFNA2/KCNQ4 locus. Mutation analysis of KCNQ4 revealed a c.821T > A (p.Leu274His) mutation of the KCNQ4 gene. This mutation has been previously identified in a Dutch family. Genetic analysis revealed a common haplotype in these two families over a region including the KCNQ4 gene. Conclusions: Familiarity with the audioprofiles of DFNA traits may lead to successful mutation analysis of the gene involved, even in a small family in which genetic linkage analysis is not an option. Alternatively, the specially developed program AudioGene can be accessed on the Internet to perform automatic audioprofile analysis of a family's (audiological) phenotype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available