4.7 Review

Overall survival and risk of second malignancies with cancer chemotherapy and G-CSF support

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 9, Pages 1903-1910

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy311

Keywords

granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; neutropenia; chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; secondary malignancy; survival

Categories

Funding

  1. Hexal AG, Holzkirchen, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The use of supportive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to reduce the risk of neutropenic complications in high-risk cancer patients is consistently recommended by several clinical practice guidelines. However, in a previous meta-analysis, G-CSF prophylaxis was associated with an increased risk of secondary malignancies while reducing long-term mortality. We present here an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was carried out to identify randomized controlled trials of cancer patients receiving conventional-dose chemotherapy, assigned to primary G-CSF support or a control group without initial GCSF, with at least 2 years of follow-up. Studies were categorized into one of the four groups, based on the chemotherapy regimen and study design. An updated meta-analysis was carried out; relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for allcause mortality and secondary malignancies were calculated. Results: Of 2604 articles screened, 14 eligible studies were identified and combined with studies identified in the previous systematic literature searches. The updated meta-analysis included a total of 68 studies presenting 71 separate comparisons. Survival was significantly improved in patients receiving primary G-CSF support, compared with patients without primary G-CSF support (mortality RR = 0.92; 95% CI 0.90-0.95; ARD= -3.3%; 95% CI -4.2--2.4; P< 0.0001). The largest improvement in survival was observed with dose-dense chemotherapy regimens with G-CSF support, compared with controls receiving no G-CSF support (mortality RR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.80-0.92; P< 0.0001). Patients who received primary G-CSF support experienced a significantly higher risk of secondary malignancies, compared with controls (RR = 1.85; 95% CI 1.19-2.88; ARD = 0.47; 95% CI 0.21-0.73; P< 0.01). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that overall survival is improved in patients receiving intensified chemotherapy with primary G-CSF support, compared with those receiving standard chemotherapy. Primary G-CSF support was also associated with a higher risk of developing secondary malignancies, including secondary acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available