The 21-gene recurrence score assay impacts adjuvant therapy recommendations for ER-positive, node-negative and node-positive early breast cancer resulting in a risk-adapted change in chemotherapy use

Biomarkers

(2012) B. V. Sinn et al.   ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY

How Reliable Is Ki-67 Immunohistochemistry in Grade 2 Breast Carcinomas? A QA Study of the Swiss Working Group of Breast- and Gynecopathologists

(2012) Zsuzsanna Varga et al.   PLoS One

Prospective transGEICAM study of the impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and traditional clinicopathological factors on adjuvant clinical decision making in women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) node-negative breast cancer

(2011) J. Albanell et al.   ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY

Strategies for subtypes—dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011

(2011) A. Goldhirsch et al.   ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY

Risk of Recurrence and Chemotherapy Benefit for Patients With Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer: Recurrence Score Alone and Integrated With Pathologic and Clinical Factors

(2011) Gong Tang et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

Prognostic Value of a Combined Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, Ki-67, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemical Score and Comparison With the Genomic Health Recurrence Score in Early Breast Cancer

(2011) Jack Cuzick et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

Physician Survey of the Effect of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay Results on Treatment Recommendations for Patients With Lymph Node–Positive, Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer

(2011) Ruth Oratz et al.   Journal of Oncology Practice

Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

(2010) S. Aebi et al.   ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY

Economic evaluation of the 21-gene signature (Oncotype DX®) in lymph node-negative/positive, hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer based on Japanese validation study (JBCRG-TR03)

(2010) Masahide Kondo et al.   BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT

Prospective Multicenter Study of the Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on Medical Oncologist and Patient Adjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment Selection

(2010) Shelly S. Lo et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

Prediction of Risk of Distant Recurrence Using the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Node-Negative and Node-Positive Postmenopausal Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Anastrozole or Tamoxifen: A TransATAC Study

(2010) Mitch Dowsett et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer

(2010) M. Elizabeth H. Hammond et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Recurrence Score-Guided Treatment Using a 21-Gene Assay in Early Breast Cancer

(2010) D. T. Tsoi et al.   ONCOLOGIST

Economic Implications of 21-Gene Breast Cancer Risk Assay from the Perspective of an Israeli-Managed Health-Care Organization

(2010) Shmuel H. Klang et al.   VALUE IN HEALTH

Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2009

(2009) A. Goldhirsch et al.   ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY

Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial

(2009) Kathy S Albain et al.   LANCET ONCOLOGY

Predictive Value of Tumor Ki-67 Expression in Two Randomized Trials of Adjuvant Chemoendocrine Therapy for Node-Negative Breast Cancer

(2008) Giuseppe Viale et al.   JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute