4.7 Article

Thymidylate synthase (TS) gene expression in primary lung cancer patients: a large-scale study in Japanese population

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages 1791-1797

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq730

Keywords

lung cancer; thymidylate synthase; TS

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan [20390374]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20390374] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Previous small-sized studies showed lower thymidylate synthase (TS) expression in adenocarcinoma of the lung, which may explain higher antitumor activity of TS-inhibiting agents such as pemetrexed. Patients and methods: To quantitatively measure TS gene expression in a large-scale Japanese population (n = 2621) with primary lung cancer, laser-captured microdissected sections were cut from primary tumors, surrounding normal lung tissues and involved nodes. Results: TS gene expression level in primary tumor was significantly higher than that in normal lung tissue (mean TS/beta-actin, 3.4 and 1.0, respectively; P < 0.01), and TS gene expression level was further higher in involved node (mean TS/beta-actin, 7.7; P < 0.01). Analyses of TS gene expression levels in primary tumor according to histologic cell type revealed that small-cell carcinoma showed highest TS expression (mean TS/beta-actin, 13.8) and that squamous cell carcinoma showed higher TS expression as compared with adenocarcinoma (mean TS/beta-actin, 4.3 and 2.3, respectively; P < 0.01); TS gene expression was significantly increased along with a decrease in the grade of tumor cell differentiation. There was no significant difference in TS gene expression according to any other patient characteristics including tumor progression. Conclusion: Lower TS expression in adenocarcinoma of the lung was confirmed in a large-scale study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available