4.7 Article

Neuroimaging Biomarkers for Parkinson Disease: Facts and Fantasy

Journal

ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 6, Pages 769-783

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ana.24291

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH
  2. NINDS [NS050425, NS058714, NS41509, NS075321]
  3. Michael J. Fox Foundation
  4. Murphy Fund
  5. American Parkinson Disease Association (APDA) Center for Advanced PD Research at Washington University
  6. Greater St Louis Chapter of the APDA
  7. McDonnell Center for Higher Brain Function
  8. Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation (Elliot Stein Family Fund for PD Research)
  9. Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation (Parkinson Disease Research Fund)
  10. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [U54TR001456] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  11. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS041509, R01NS050425, R01NS058714, R01NS075321, U54NS065701] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this grand rounds, we focus on development, validation, and application of neuroimaging biomarkers for Parkinson disease (PD). We cover whether such biomarkers can be used to identify presymptomatic individuals (probably yes), provide a measure of PD severity (in a limited fashion, but frequently done poorly), investigate pathophysiology of parkinsonian disorders (yes, if done carefully), play a role in differential diagnosis of parkinsonism (not well), and investigate pathology underlying cognitive impairment (yes, in conjunction with postmortem data). Along the way, we clarify several issues about definitions of biomarkers and surrogate endpoints. The goal of this lecture is to provide a basis for interpreting current literature and newly proposed clinical tools in PD. In the end, one should be able to critically distinguish fact from fantasy. Ann Neurol 2014;76:769-783

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available