4.3 Article

Improvement of thua nao production using protein-rich soybean and Bacillus subtilis TN51 starter culture

Journal

ANNALS OF MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages 785-795

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1007/s13213-011-0319-1

Keywords

Fermented soybean; Soybean; thua nao; Bacillus subtilis; Starter culture

Funding

  1. Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Research Scholarship
  2. Thailand Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thua nao, a Thai traditional fermented soybean, is locally produced, of irregular quality and under risk of contamination with spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms during the artisanal process. This study aims to select a protein-rich soybean variety as a material for fermentation and improve organoleptical quality of the product by fermenting sterilized soybean with pure starter of TN51 previously isolated from a traditional . Changes in microbiological and physicochemical qualities of soybean were monitored through fermentation period for 72 h. The completely fermented products were also subjected to sensory evaluation and antimicrobial activity against 13 microbial pathogens and two fermentative yeasts. Of five soybean cultivars tested (i.e., CM60, Pabong7, Kunpae, TG55 and TG145), based on seed size, production yield, protein and fat contents, TG145 was the most suitable for production of due to its high protein content (45.8%), lowest fat (15.6%), small seed size (11.1 g/100 seeds) and potent production yield (358 kg/rai). produced by fermented autoclaved soybean with pure starter culture of TN51 (TNB51) could be improved considerably for its microbiological and chemical qualities, especially using a smaller amount of ammonia that led to a more organoleptically acceptable product than produced by naturally occurring microbial fermentation (TNMX). Of tested microorganisms, only Gram-positive bacteria (i.e., , , , , and s) were inhibited by methanolic extracts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available