4.5 Article

Positive predictive value of primary inpatient discharge,diagnoses of infection among cancer patients in the Danish National Registry of Patients

Journal

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages 593-597

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.05.011

Keywords

Cancer; Infection; International Classification of Disease codes; Predictive value of tests; Pharmacoepidemiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Pharmacovigilance studies of cancer treatment frequently monitor infections. Predictive values of algorithms identifying disease depend on prevalence of the disease in the population under study. We therefore estimated the positive predictive value (PPV) of primary inpatient diagnosis of infection among cancer patients in the Danish National Registry of Patients (DNRP). Methods: The algorithm to identify infections in the DNPR was based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes. A physician blinded to the type of sampled infection reviewed the medical charts and assessed the presence and type of infection. Using the physician global assessment as gold standard, we computed PPVs with and without requiring agreement on infection type. Results: We retrieved 266 of 272 medical charts (98%). Presence of infection was confirmed in 261 patients, resulting in an overall PPV of 98% (95% confidence interval, 96%-99%). When requiring agreement on infection type, overall PPV was 77%. For skin infections, pneumonia, and sepsis, PPVs were 79%, 93% and 84%, respectively. For these infections, we additionally calculated PPVs using evidence-based criteria as the gold standard. PPV was similar for pneumonia, but lower for skin infections and sepsis. Conclusions: The Danish National Registry of Patients is suitable for monitoring infections requiring hospitalization among cancer patients. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available