4.4 Article

Salmeterol and fluticasone in young children with multiple-trigger wheeze

Journal

ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 109, Issue 1, Pages 65-70

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2012.05.006

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Funds
  2. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  3. Finnish Foundation for Allergy Research
  4. GlaxoSmithKline [SAS40069]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Treatment guidelines recommend using an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus a long-acting beta(2)-agonist (LABA) for childhood asthma when the symptoms are not controlled by ICS alone, but the appropriate use of LABAs in children continues to be debated. Objective: To compare the efficacy of an inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone propionate combination, 50/100 mu g twice daily, with fluticasone propionate, 100 mu g twice daily, or salmeterol, 50 mu g twice daily, in children with multiple-trigger wheeze. Methods: A total of 105 children 4 to 7 years of age with multiple-trigger wheezing based on respiratory symptoms and bronchodilator responsiveness and/or exercise-induced bronchoconstriction without a viral cold were randomized to salmeterol-fluticasone, fluticasone propionate alone, or salmeterol alone via a metered-dose inhaler and a spacer device for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was exhaled nitric oxide level. Secondary outcomes were lung function measurements via impulse oscillometry, respiratory symptoms, and rescue medication use. Results: The exhaled nitric oxide levels decreased after all treatments, significantly more so after salmeterol-fluticasone and fluticasone than with salmeterol (adjusted geometric means at 8 weeks: salmeterol-fluticasone, 9.4 ppb; fluticasone, 9.3 ppb; salmeterol, 13.9 ppb; salmeterol-fluticasone vs salmeterol, P = .02; fluticasone vs salmeterol, P = .01). No treatment differences were found with respect to respiratory symptoms or median rescue use. Salmeterol-fluticasone resulted in a small but statistically significant improvement in baseline lung function compared with fluticasone. All treatments were equally well tolerated. Conclusion: The effects of salmeterol-fluticasone and fluticasone were comparable, although lung function improvement was better with salmeterol-fluticasone than with fluticasone alone. There is no obvious benefit in initiation therapy with salmeterol-fluticasone rather than fluticasone alone in the treatment of steroid-naive children with multiple-trigger wheeze.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available