4.4 Article

Short-term grazing of lucerne and chicory increases ovulation rate in synchronised Merino ewes

Journal

ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE
Volume 121, Issue 3-4, Pages 242-248

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.06.007

Keywords

Sheep; Ovulation rate; Nutrition; Flushing; Lupins; Lucerne; Chicory

Funding

  1. EverGraze(R) - More livestock from perennials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the ability of short-term grazing of live = green pasture to increase ovulation rate during late summer when annual pasture is generally dead and of low quality. Ovulation rates, measured by the number of corpora lutea, were compared between 4 nutritional treatments: senesced phalaris (Phalaris aquatica), phalaris plus 500 g lupin grain per day, lucerne (Medicago sativa) or chicory (Chicorum intybus) pastures. The study used 100 Merino ewes per treatment, divided between 2 replicates. The experiment was repeated in 3 years; February 2006, and January 2007 and 2008. Oestrus was synchronised and the ewes grazed the pastures for 9 days prior to ovulation at times corresponding to days 8-17 of the cycle in 2006, and days 6-14 in 2007 and 2008. The proportion of ewes producing multiple ovulations was higher (P<0.05) in the lucerne and chicory (0.36, 0.38) than the phalaris (0.27), and intermediate in the lupin (0.33) treatment. Regression analysis showed that the proportion of ewes with multiple ovulations increased with the quantity of live herbage (P < 0.04). Responses were achieved even at low levels of live herbage with 90% of the maximum proportion of multiples occurring at 350 kg DM/ha. It is concluded that providing short-term grazing of live chicory or lucerne to ewes can increase ovulation rates relative to ewes grazing senesced phalaris and to levels similar to those achieved by lupin grain supplementation. Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available