4.5 Article

Nucleotide variability and haplotype heterogeneity at the porcine fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) gene

Journal

ANIMAL GENETICS
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages 96-100

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2012.02352.x

Keywords

balancing selection; fat mass and obesity-associated; haplotypes; Italian Duroc; nucleotide variability; pig breeds

Funding

  1. University of Bologna (FAGenomicH project)
  2. MiPAAF (INNOVAGEN) funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A large number of studies have confirmed that variants within the fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) gene are associated with higher obesity risk in humans. We and others have shown that FTO polymorphisms are associated with fat deposition and related traits in several pig populations, thus confirming the role of this gene in fatness across species. However, some differences observed in different pig populations may be derived, at least in part, from genetic heterogeneity at this locus. Here, we characterise the nucleotide variability and haplotype diversity of the porcine FTO gene in breeds having different predispositions to fat deposition traits. We resequenced 4749 bp of coding and non-coding regions of the porcine FTO gene in 44 pigs of eight different breeds and identified 27 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and four insertions/deletions. A positive Tajima's D-value (P < 0.10) obtained in Italian Duroc pigs may be compatible with putative balancing selection. From the sequenced pig panel, 20 haplotypes were inferred, some of which clustered according to the breed of origin (Meishan and Italian Duroc). Genetic heterogeneity at this locus could complicate the dissection of the effects of this gene on fat deposition and production traits in pigs. This situation resembles, to some extent, what has been reported in humans, thus making the study of the porcine FTO gene variability especially interesting, as it could be used as a model to understand the complex and elusive role of this gene in human obesity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available