4.6 Article

Comparison of open-circuit respiration chambers with a micrometeorological method for determining methane emissions from beef cattle grazing a tropical pasture

Journal

ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 166-67, Issue -, Pages 240-247

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.014

Keywords

Cattle; Methane; Micrometeorology; Dispersion; Rhodes grass

Funding

  1. Australian Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
  2. Meat and Livestock Australia
  3. McMaster Research Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emissions of CH(4) methane from beef cattle grazing pastures characteristic of northern Australia are yet to be reliably quantified. Poor quality pastures and low animal productivity are typically associated with high CH(4) emissions/unit animal product. Our study reports two independent methodologies to quantify CH(4) emissions from beef cattle at herd scale and from individual animals. The first method identifies each animal within a herd (n = 18) as a point source of CH(4). Emissions at the herd scale were estimated with a backward Lagrangian stochastic (bLs) dispersion model. This model used atmospheric turbulence data and line-averaged concentrations of CH(4) measured with an open-path laser and inputs (ppm) from 5 paths across 1 ha Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) dominated pastures that were flat and free of obstructions. The second method used open circuit respiration chambers to measure 24 h CH(4) emissions from 18 steers fed freshly cut forage from the same pasture. The CH(4) emissions determined using the dispersion method were 136.1 +/- 21.5 g/d or 29.7 +/- 3.70 g/kg dry matter (DM) intake and 114 +/- 5.1 g/d or 30.1 +/- 2.19 g/kg DM intake using open circuit respiration chambers. Estimates of CH(4) emissions based on predictive algorithms for beef cattle grazing similar pastures range from 82.7 +/- 3.98 g/d to 112.7 +/- 2.57 g/d. Additional studies with different tropical pastures and herds are required to obtain estimated CH(4) emission values for further comparisons with predictions from the Australian Greenhouse Gas Inventory and those currently reported in the literature for beef cattle. This paper is part of the special issue entitled: Greenhouse Gases in Animal Agriculture Finding a Balance between Food and Emissions, Guest Edited by T.A. McAllister, Section Guest Editors; K.A. Beauchemin, X. Hao, S. McGinn and Editor for Animal Feed Science and Technology, P.H. Robinson. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available