Journal
ANIMAL COGNITION
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 789-796Publisher
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-009-0238-8
Keywords
Spatial transposition; Invisible object displacement; Spatial cognition; Object permanence; Dogs; Great apes
Categories
Funding
- Leonardo da Vinci
- Churchill College, University of Cambridge, UK
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Knowing that objects continue to exist after disappearing from sight and tracking invisible object displacements are two basic elements of spatial cognition. The current study compares dogs and apes in an invisible transposition task. Food was hidden under one of two cups in full view of the subject. After that both cups were displaced, systematically varying two main factors, whether cups were crossed during displacement and whether the cups were substituted by the other cup or instead cups were moved to new locations. While the apes were successful in all conditions, the dogs had a strong preference to approach the location where they last saw the reward, especially if this location remained filled. In addition, dogs seem to have especial difficulties to track the reward when both containers crossed their path during displacement. These results confirm the substantial difference that exists between great apes and dogs with regard to mental representation abilities required to track the invisible displacements of objects.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available