4.5 Article

What time is it? Coping with expected feeding time in capuchin monkeys

Journal

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
Volume 80, Issue 1, Pages 117-123

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.04.008

Keywords

capuchin monkey; Cebus apella; conflict prevention; grooming; planning; prefeeding

Funding

  1. European Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite their importance for group-living animals, mechanisms that prevent aggressive escalation have seldom been investigated. Conflict prevention might imply the ability to foresee future needs and the question whether animals have this capacity is still open to debate. A few studies have suggested that animals may be able to use anticipatory strategies of conflict management to decrease stress levels and prevent social tension caused by food competition. None the less, the effectiveness of these supposedly preventive strategies has rarely been investigated, and their cognitive requirements are still unclear. We explored these issues by observing a group of captive capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella, subject to fixed scheduled feeding. We collected data on affiliative and aggressive interactions during three conditions: prefeeding, feeding and control. We found that grooming increased before a predictable competitive situation such as scheduled feeding, and that grooming reduced the risk of aggressive escalation and increased co-feeding during the subsequent feeding period. Therefore, prefeeding grooming served as a conflict prevention mechanism. Nevertheless, capuchin monkeys did not specifically select their prefeeding grooming partners on the basis of the expected benefits in the future competitive situation, suggesting that they were not planning their future behaviour, but were probably responding to the current tense situation. (C) 2010 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available