4.5 Article

Single versus multiple cues in mate discrimination by males and females

Journal

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages 151-159

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.09.029

Keywords

courtship; Gryllus integer; Gryllus lineaticeps; mating preferences; multiple cues; pheromones; sexual dimorphism; species recognition

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IBN-0076484]
  2. University of California, Davis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Courtship communication can function in both species recognition and mate choice. Little is known about how animals prioritize signals or cues for species identification versus intraspecific mate choice when several information sources are available, such as when communication spans several sensory modalities or spatiotemporal scales. Cricket courtship, for example, involves transmission of acoustic signals as well as chemosensory contact. We explored how chemical cues function in sex and species recognition for both male and female crickets, and then evaluated their use in a mating context where additional stimuli were available. First, we observed the response of female and male Gryllus integer to the chemical cues of conspecifics and sympatric G. lineaticeps. Males' strongest response was to conspecific female chemical cues. Although females responded most strongly to male chemical cues, they did not show species discrimination. Next, we compared the responses of male and female G. integer to conspecifics and heterospecifics in mating trials. Females directed more aggressive behaviour and less chemosensory behaviour towards heterospecific males, but males courted females of both species with equal intensities. These results suggest a sex-based difference in cue usage: for males, the additional stimuli present during mating trials appeared to override species-specific chemical cues, whereas for females, additional stimuli apparently bias responses towards conspecifics. (C) 2008 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available