4.5 Article

Measuring copper and zinc superoxide dismutase from spinal cord tissue using electrospray mass spectrometry

Journal

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 415, Issue 1, Pages 52-58

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.03.029

Keywords

Metals; Superoxide dismutase; Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Mass spectrometry; Copper; Zinc

Funding

  1. National Institute for Environmental and Health Sciences [NIEHS P30ES000210]
  2. National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NINDS R01NS058628A]
  3. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine [NCCAM P01AT002034]
  4. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metals are key cofactors for many proteins, yet quantifying the metals bound to specific proteins is a persistent challenge in vivo. We have developed a rapid and sensitive method using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry to measure Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD1) directly from the spinal cord of SOD1-overexpressing transgenic rats. Metal dyshomeostasis has been implicated in motor neuron death in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Using the assay, SOD1 was directly measured from 100 mu g of spinal cord, allowing for anatomical quantitation of apo, metal-deficient, and holo SOD1. SOD1 was bound on a C(4) Ziptip that served as a disposable column, removing interference by physiological salts and lipids. SOD1 was eluted with 30% acetonitrile plus 100 mu M formic acid to provide sufficient hydrogen ions to ionize the protein without dislodging metals. SOD1 was quantified by including bovine SOD1 as an internal standard. SOD1 could be measured in subpicomole amounts and resolved to within 2 Da of the predicted parent mass. The methods can be adapted to quantify modifications to other proteins in vivo that can be resolved by mass spectrometry. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available