4.7 Article

Rapid and precise determination of Sr and Nd isotopic ratios in geological samples from the same filament loading by thermal ionization mass spectrometry employing a single-step separation scheme

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 727, Issue -, Pages 54-60

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2012.03.040

Keywords

Geological sample; Sr-Nd isotopes; Extraction chromatography; Thermal ionization mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40973044, 40903009]
  2. Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences [ZC11200970]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) offers the excellent precision and accuracy of the Stand Nd isotopic ratio analysis for geological samples, but this method is labour intensive, expensive and time-consuming. In this study, a new analytical protocol by TIMS is presented that aims at improving analytical efficiency and cutting down experimental cost. Using the single-step cation exchange resin technique, mixed Sr and rare earth elements (REEs) fractions were separated from matrix and evaporated to dryness. Afterwards, mixed Sr + REEs fractions were dissolved and loaded onto the same Re filament using 1 mu L of 2 M HCl. Then, Sr and Nd were sequentially measured without venting using TIMS. In contrast to conventional TIMS methods, the merits of this analytical protocol are its cost- and timesaving adaptations. The applicability of our method is evaluated by replicated measurements of Sr-87/Sr-86 and Nd-143/Nd-144 for nine international silicate rock reference materials, spanning a wide range of bulk compositions. The typical internal precision in this study is ca. 0.001% (RSE) for Sr-87/Sr-86 and Nd-143/Nd-144; the analytical results obtained for these standard rocks show a good agreement with reported values, indicating the effectiveness of the proposed method. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available