4.1 Article

Production and characterization of bioflocculants for mineral processing applications

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINERAL PROCESSING
Volume 137, Issue -, Pages 15-25

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.minpro.2015.02.007

Keywords

Bacillus lichemformis; Bacillus firmus; Bioflocculants; Clay flocculation; Bioremediation

Funding

  1. National Academy of Sciences, India (NASI)
  2. Platinum Jubilee Senior Scientist Fellowship
  3. Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India [SR/S3/RF-ME/01/2007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comparative study of two bacterial strains namely, Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus firmus in the production of bioflocculants was made. The highest bioflocculant yield of 16.55 g/L was obtained from B. licheniformis (L) and 10 g/L from B. firmus (F). The bioflocculants obtained from the bacterial species were water soluble and insoluble in organic solvents. FTIR spectral analysis revealed the presence of hydroxyl, carboxyl and sugar derivatives in the bioflocculants. Thermal characterization by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showed the crystalline transition and the melting point (T-m) at 90-100 degrees C. Effects of bioflocculant dosage and pH on the flocculation of clay fines were evaluated. Highest bioflocculation efficiency on kaolin clay suspensions was observed at an optimum bioflocculant dosage of 5 g/L. The optimum pH range for the maximum bioflocculation was at pH 7-9. Bioflocculants exhibited high efficiency in dye decolorization. The maximum Cr (VI) removal was found to be 85 % for L (bioflocculant dosage at 2 g/L). This study demonstrates that microbial bioflocculants find potential applications in mineral processing such as selective flocculation of mineral fines, decolorization of dye solutions and in the remediation of toxic metal solutions. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available