4.6 Article

Evaluation of antibacterial effect and mode of Coptidis rhizoma by microcalorimetry coupled with chemometric techniques

Journal

ANALYST
Volume 137, Issue 1, Pages 216-222

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1an15826k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Major Program [2009ZX09502-022, 2009ZX09502-025]
  2. Industry Research Program of Traditional Chinese Medicine [200807020]
  3. National Science Foundation of China [30973947, 81173539]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the antibacterial effect and mode of Coptidis rhizoma on Escherichia coli was evaluated by microcalorimetry coupled with chemometric techniques. Using an isothermal microcalorimeter, the metabolic profiles of E. coli growth at 37 degrees C affected by 15 batches of C. rhizoma were measured. Through principal component analysis (PCA) on nine quantitative thermo-kinetic parameters obtained from the metabolic power time profiles of E. coli, the antibacterial effects of C. rhizoma from various sources could be easily evaluated by analyzing the change of the two main thermo-kinetic parameters, growth rate constant k(2) and maximum heat-output power p(m)(2), in the second exponential phase of E. coli growth. Then, hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) was carried out on the two parameters to distinguish those C. rhizoma samples in respect to their antibacterial effects. Clear results were obtained to show that all 15 C. rhizoma samples with different antibacterial effects could be successfully grouped in accordance with their origins. Ranked in decreasing order, the antibacterial mode of C. rhizoma samples that were from Sichuan province had the strongest antibacterial effects, followed by samples from Chongqing city and Hubei province. Our results revealed that the developed microcalorimetry with chemometric techniques had the potential perspective for evaluating the effect and mode of Coptidis rhizoma and other Chinese materia medicas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available