4.7 Article

Estimating constitutive equation of structural steel using indentation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES
Volume 90, Issue -, Pages 151-161

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.11.007

Keywords

Constitutive equation; Structural steel; Indentation; Dimensional analysis; Finite element analysis

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP) [2011-0030040]
  2. Human Resources Development program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Korea Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy [20124030200050]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Unlike other metal materials, structural steels show plastic plateau in their constitutive equations. The plastic plateau continues from yield strain to the starting-point of strain hardening. In this study, the constitutive equations of structural steels, including the plastic plateau, were extracted from the indenting load to depth curves of indentation experiments. While conventional equations were used to determine the elastic modulus of steel, new equations were developed to determine the yield strength and the strain hardening exponent of steel from the indentation results by considering the plastic plateau. Two dimensionless relationships between the constitutive properties of steel and the characteristics of indenting load to depth curves were derived. A finite element (FE) model to simulate indentation was developed and FE analyses for 576 combinations of steel constitutive properties were conducted. The dimensionless relationships were then established in polynomial equations by regression analyses of the FE results. Indentation and uniaxial tensile loading tests were also performed to verify the FE model and the proposed equations to extract the constitutive properties using indentation. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available