4.4 Article

Ventilated postmortem computed tomography in children: feasibility and initial experience

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages 1113-1120

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-015-1189-z

Keywords

Postmortem; Computed tomography; Children; Lung; Autopsy

Funding

  1. NIHR Clinician Scientist AWARD
  2. NIHR Senior Investigator award
  3. Great Ormond Street Children's Charity
  4. Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre
  5. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
  6. National Institute for Health Research [NIHR-CS-012-002] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ventilated postmortem computed tomography (vPMCT) is associated with improved pulmonary imaging compared to standard PMCT in adults. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of performing ventilated PMCT in children. Postmortem thoracic CT was performed before (PMCT) and after ventilation (vPMCT). We used a range of mouthpieces, including endotracheal tubes, bag and mask and laryngeal mask airway (LMA). Hounsfield units of the lungs at PMCT were measured for normal and abnormal lung areas, before and after ventilation. All patients underwent full conventional autopsy and histology. Twelve patients underwent ventilated PMCT, median age 52 days (range 3-304 days). Ventilated PMCT provided diagnostic lung images in all 12 cases, compared to only three unventilated PMCT examinations (p < 0.005). In all cases, ventilated PMCT improved the image quality of aerated lungs irrespective of the method used. Average lung Hounsfield units decreased significantly with ventilation from pre-vPMCT values (-134.1 +/- 215.1 vs post-vPMCT -531.8 +/- 190.1; p < 0.001). LMA with continuous positive pressure ventilation subjectively provided the best results. Ventilated PMCT significantly improves lung aeration in children and can aid recognition of areas of abnormality in paediatric lungs. Such advances will improve accuracy and uptake of imaging-assisted autopsies in children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available