4.5 Article

Mossbauer parameters of iron in phosphate minerals: Implications for interpretation of martian data

Journal

AMERICAN MINERALOGIST
Volume 99, Issue 5-6, Pages 914-942

Publisher

MINERALOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2138/am.2014.4701

Keywords

Mossbauer; Mars; phosphates; alluaudite; arrojadite; vivianite; triphylite

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX08AP42G]
  2. NSF [MRI-0923224]
  3. NASA [NNX08AP42G, 96309] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phosphate minerals, while relatively rare, show a broad range of crystal structure types with linkages among PO4 tetrahedra mimicking the hierarchy of polymerization of SiO4 tetrahedra seen in silicate minerals. To augment previous Mossbauer studies of individual phosphate species and groups of species, this paper presents new Mossbauer data on 63 different phosphate samples, and integrates them with data on more than 37 phosphate species in 62 other studies from the literature. Variations in Mossbauer parameters of different sites in each mineral are then related to both the local polyhedral environment around the Fe cations and the overall structural characteristics of each species. The entire aggregated Mossbauer data set on phosphate minerals is juxtaposed against parameters obtained for spectra from the MIMOS spectrometers on Mars. This comparison demonstrates that signatures from many different phosphate or sulfate mineral species could also be contributing to Mars Mossbauer spectra. Results underscore the conclusion that unique mineral identifications are generally not possible from Mossbauer data alone, particularly for paramagnetic phases, although combining Mossbauer results with other data sets enables a greater level of confidence in constraining mineralogy. This study provides a wealth of new data on Fe-bearing phosphate minerals to bolster future analyses of Mossbauer spectra acquired on Mars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available