4.1 Article

Identification of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica organisms with reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone from fecal samples of cows in dairy herds

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH
Volume 70, Issue 3, Pages 389-393

Publisher

AMER VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.70.3.389

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. USDA/CSREES/IREE [2004-51110-02155]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective-To estimate the relationship between therapeutic use of ceftiofur and recovery of Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp with reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone from feces of dairy cattle. Animals-3,840 mature dairy cows on 50 dairy herds in Ohio. Procedures-Fecal samples were obtained from up to 100 mature dairy cows on each farm, Samples were screened for E coli and Salmonella spp with reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone by use of selective media. Results-E coli with reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone was recovered from 92% (46/50) of the herds and 60.9% (2,338/3,840) of cows. Salmonella spp were recovered from 44% (22/50) of the herds and 9.9% (382/3,840) of cows. No association was found between ceftiofur use and recovery of E coli with reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone at the herd level. However, recovery of E coli with reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone was more likely from cows in herds in which Salmonella spp were also recovered on the day of collection (odds ratio, 24.96; 95% confidence interval, 3.17 to 196,68) than from herds in which Salmonella spp were not recovered. Odds of recovery of E coli with reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone from an individual cow increased 62% (odds ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.16 to 2.25) for every 454-kg increase in herd milk production. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-No evidence was found that the use of ceftiofur on dairy farms increases the prevalence or dissemination of Salmonella spp or E coli with reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone. (Am J Vet Res 2009;70:389-393)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available