4.5 Article

Sentinel Chicken Seroconversions Track Tangential Transmission of West Nile Virus to Humans in the Greater Los Angeles Area of California

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE
Volume 83, Issue 5, Pages 1137-1145

Publisher

AMER SOC TROP MED & HYGIENE
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0078

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases NIH [R01 AI055607 01]
  2. National Air and Space Administration NASA [RM08 6044]
  3. RAPIDD of the Science & Technology Directorate Department of Homeland Security
  4. Fogarty International Center National Institutes of Health
  5. National Center for Research Resources [RR024146]
  6. Greater Los Angeles County Vector Control District
  7. ELC of the CDC
  8. California Department of Public Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Los Angeles California West Nile virus (WNV) has followed a pattern of emergence amplification subsidence, and resurgence A time series cross correlation analysis of human case counts and sentinel chicken seroconveisions revealed temporal concordance indicating that chicken serconversions tracked tangential transmission of WNV from the basic passeriform Culex amplification cycle to humans lather than antecedent enzootic amplification Sentinel seroconversions provided the location and time of tiansmission as opposed to human cases which frequently were reported late and were assumed to be acquired 2-14 days before disease onset at their residence Cox models revealed that warming degree days were associated with the increased risk of seroconversion whereas elevated herd immunity in peridomestic birds dampened set conversion risk Spatially surveillance data collected within a 5 km radius of flock locations 15-28 days before the bleed date were most predictive of a seroconversion In urban Los Angeles sentinel chicken seroconversions could be used as an outcome measure in decision support for emergency intervention

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available