4.6 Article

Hepatitis B Reactivation and Rituximab: A New Boxed Warning and Considerations for Solid Organ Transplantation

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 788-796

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12649

Keywords

Hepatitis B virus; immunosuppression; rituximab; solid organ transplantation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Use of rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed at the CD20 antigen, continues to increase in solid organ transplantation (SOT) for several off-label uses. In September 2013, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Drug Safety Communication to oncology, rheumatology and pharmacy communities outlining a new Boxed Warning for rituximab. Citing 109 cases of fatal hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in persons receiving rituximab therapy with previous or chronic HBV infection documented in their Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS), the FDA recommends screening for HBV serologies in all patients planned to receive rituximab and antiviral prophylaxis in any patient with a positive history of HBV infection. There is a lack of data pertaining to this topic in the SOT population despite an increase in off-label indications. Previous reports suggest patients receiving rituximab, on average, were administered six doses prior to HBV reactivation. Recommendations on prophylaxis, treatment and re-challenging patients with therapy after resolution of reactivation remain unclear. Based on data from the FDA AERS and multiple analyses in oncology, SOT providers utilizing rituximab should adhere to the FDA warnings and recommendations regarding HBV reactivation until further data are available in the SOT population. This report describes the basis behind the FDA's recent Boxed Warning issued to rituximab regarding hepatitis B reactivation; the potential impact on the solid organ transplant community; and recommendations for screening, prophylaxis, and treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available