4.6 Article

Polyreactive Antibodies Developing Amidst Humoral Rejection of Human Kidney Grafts Bind Apoptotic Cells and Activate Complement

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages 2590-2600

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12394

Keywords

Antibody-mediated rejection; apoptosis; C4d; polyreactive antibodies

Funding

  1. Fahd and Nadia Alireza's Research Fund
  2. Roche Organ Transplantation Research Foundation (ROTRF)
  3. National Institute of Health, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK083352]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) is associated with a variety of graft-reactive antibodies following kidney transplant. To characterize these antibodies, we immortalized 107 B cell clones from a patient with AMR. In a previous study, we showed that six clones were reacting to multiple self-antigens as well as to HLA and MICA for two of them, thus displaying a pattern of polyreactivity. We show here that all six polyreactive clones also reacted to apoptotic but not viable cells. More generally we observed a nearly perfect overlap between polyreactivity and reactivity to apoptotic cells. Functionally, polyreactive antibodies can activate complement, resulting in the deposition of C3d and C4d at the surface of target cells. Testing the serum of 88 kidney transplant recipients revealed a significantly higher IgG reactivity to apoptotic cells in AMR patients than in patients with stable graft function. Moreover, total IgG purified from AMR patients had increased complement activating properties compared to IgG from non-AMR patients. Overall, our studies show the development of polyreactive antibodies cross-reactive to apoptotic cells during AMR. Further studies are now warranted to determine their contribution to the detection of C4d in graft biopsies as well as their role in the pathophysiology of AMR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available