4.6 Article

Monitoring of Immunoglobulin Levels Identifies Kidney Transplant Recipients at High Risk of Infection

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages 2763-2773

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04192.x

Keywords

Humoral immunity; hypogammaglobulinemia; infection; kidney transplantation; outcome; risk factors

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias [FIS]) [11/01538]
  2. Fundacion Mutua Madrilena de Investigacion Medica [FMM 2010/0015]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Instituto de Salud Carlos III) [CM11/00187]
  4. Fundacion Mutua Madrilena

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We aimed to analyze the incidence, risk factors and impact of hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) in 226 kidney transplant (KT) recipients in which serum immunoglobulin (Ig) levels were prospectively assessed at baseline, month 1 (T1), and month 6 (T6). The prevalence of IgG HGG increased from 6.6% (baseline) to 52.0% (T1) and subsequently decreased to 31.4% (T6) (p < 0.001). The presence of IgG HGG at baseline (odds ratio [OR] 26.9; p = 0.012) and a positive anti-HCV status (OR 0.17; p = 0.023) emerged as risk factors for the occurrence of posttransplant IgG HGG. Patients with HGG of any class at T1 had higher incidences of overall (p = 0.018) and bacterial infection (p = 0.004), bacteremia (p = 0.054) and acute pyelonephritis (p = 0.003) in the intermediate period (months 16). Patients with HGG at T6 had higher incidences of overall (p = 0.004) and bacterial infection (p < 0.001) in the late period (>6 month). A complementary loglog model identified posttransplant HGG as an independent risk factor for overall (hazard ratio [HR] 2.03; p < 0.001) and bacterial infection (HR 2.68; p < 0.0001). Monitoring of humoral immunity identifies KT recipients at high risk of infection, offering the opportunity for preemptive immunoglobulin replacement therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available