4.6 Article

Induction of Allograft Tolerance by Monoclonal CD3 Antibodies: A Matter of Timing

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages 2909-2919

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04213.x

Keywords

CD3 antibodies; immune tolerance; islet allografts; regulatory T cells

Funding

  1. RISET consortium (Reprogramming the Immune System for the Establishment of Tolerance) from the European Commission (FP6)
  2. Fondation CENTAURE
  3. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF)
  4. INSERM
  5. Fondation Day Solvay
  6. Dutch Kidney Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite remarkable progress in organ transplantation through the development of a wealth of immunosuppressive drugs highly effective at controlling acute rejection, two major problems still remain, the loss of transplants due to chronic rejection and the growing number of sensitized recipients due to previous transplants, transfusions or pregnancies. Induction of immune tolerance appears to be the only way to curb this complex situation. Here we describe that a therapy, already successfully used to restore immune tolerance to self-antigens in overt autoimmunity, is effective at promoting transplant tolerance. We demonstrate that a short low-dose course with CD3 antibodies started after transplantation, at the time of effector T cell priming to alloantigens, induces permanent acceptance of fully mismatched islet allografts. Mechanistic studies revealed that antigen-specific regulatory and effector T cells are differentially affected by the treatment. CD3 antibody treatment preferentially induces apoptosis of activated alloreactive T cells which is mandatory for tolerance induction. In contrast, regulatory T cells are relatively spared from CD3 antibody-induced depletion and can transfer antigen-specific tolerance thus arguing for their prominent role in sustaining long-term graft survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available