4.6 Article

Polyfunctional Cytomegalovirus-Specific Immunity in Lung Transplant Recipients Receiving Valganciclovir Prophylaxis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 553-560

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03405.x

Keywords

Cytomegalovirus; lung transplantation; valganciclovir

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [KL2RR024127]
  2. American Society of Transplantation Clinical Faculty Development
  3. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute [SCCOR 1P50-HL084917-01, K24-091140-01]
  4. Duke Translational Medicine Institute
  5. Duke University's CTSA, NCRR/NIH [1 UL1 RR024128-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common opportunistic infection after lung transplant. Despite effective antiviral medications to treat CMV, invasive CMV disease contributes to lung allograft dysfunction and worse survival. Efforts to prevent CMV have led to the use of valganciclovir prophylaxis for increasingly longer periods after transplant. A pivotal concern with long-term antiviral prophylaxis is that it may prevent or delay the development of CMV-specific immunity and increase the subsequent risk of late onset disease. To address this issue, we conducted a pilot study to determine if CMV-specific immunity was detectable in lung transplant recipients at risk for CMV while on antiviral prophylaxis. Utilizing polychromatic flow cytometry panels, CMV-specific immunity was determined by peripheral blood CD4 and CD8 T cell expression of cytokines in response to the HLA restricted CMV peptides pp65 and IE-1. We determined CMV seropositive lung transplant recipients on valganciclovir for a median of 6 months from transplant have a detectable polyfunctional CMV-specific T cell response which is comparable to seropositive recipients not on antiviral medications and to healthy seropositive nontransplant controls. Thus, valganciclovir prophylaxis does not appear to impair the development of CMV-specific immunity in lung transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available