4.6 Article

IL-17 Expression by Tubular Epithelial Cells in Renal Transplant Recipients with Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 1248-1259

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03529.x

Keywords

Complement system; epithelial tubular cells; IL-17; kidney transplantation; renal acute rejection

Funding

  1. Ministero dell'Istruzione dell'Universita e della ricerca Scientifica
  2. University of Bari

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute rejection is still a common complication of kidney transplantation. IL-17 is known to be associated with allograft rejection but the cellular source and the role of this cytokine remains unclear. We investigated IL-17 graft expression in renal transplant recipients with acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), acute T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) and acute tubular damage due to calcineurin-inhibitor toxicity (CNI). In acute ABMR, tubular IL-17 protein expression was significantly increased compared to TCMR, where most of the IL-17+cells were CD4+graft infiltrating lymphocytes, IFTA and CNI control groups. The tubular expression of IL-17 in acute ABMR colocalized with JAK2 phosphorylation and peritubular capillaries C4d deposition. In addition, IL-17 tubular expression was directly and significantly correlated with the extension of C4d deposits. In cultured proximal tubular cells, C3a induced IL-17 gene and protein expression along with an increased in JAK2 phosphorylation. The inhibition of JAK2 abolished C3a-induced IL-17 expression. The use of steroids and monoclonal antibodies reduced IL-17 expression, JAK2 phosphorylation and C4d deposition in acute ABMR patients. Our data suggest that tubular cells represent a significant source of IL-17 in ABMR and this event might be mediated by the complement system activation featuring this condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available