4.6 Article

The Effect of Sirolimus on Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels in Male Renal Transplant Recipients Without Prostate Cancer

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages 2668-2673

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02430.x

Keywords

Gender; kidney transplantation; posttransplant monitoring; posttransplant cancer; posttransplant malignancies; prevention; prostate cancer; recipient age; sirolimus; tacrolimus; tumor

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R21 CA109057, R01 CA133209] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In kidney recipients, the immunosuppressant sirolimus has been associated with a decreased incidence of de novo posttransplant malignancies (including prostate cancer). But the effect of sirolimus on the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood level, an important prostate cancer screening tool, remains unknown. We studied male kidney recipients > 50 years old (transplanted from January 1994 to December 2006) without clinical evidence for prostate cancer. Pre- and posttransplant PSA levels were analyzed for 97 recipients (n = 19 on sirolimus, n = 78 on tacrolimus [control group]). Pretransplant PSA was similar for sirolimus versus tacrolimus recipients (mean, 1.8 versus 1.7 ng/mL, p = 0.89), but posttransplant PSA was significantly lower for recipients on sirolimus (mean, 0.9 versus 1.9 ng/mL, respectively, p < 0.001). The mean difference between pretransplant and posttransplant PSA was -0.9 ng/mL (50.0%, p = 0.006) for the sirolimus group versus +0.2 ng/mL (+11.8%, p = 0.24) for the tacrolimus group. By multivariate analysis, only pretransplant PSA and immunosuppression with sirolimus independently impacted posttransplant PSA. Our data strongly suggest that sirolimus is associated with a significant PSA decrease in kidney recipients. Future studies must investigate the clinical implications of our findings for the use of PSA for prostate cancer screening in male kidney recipients on sirolimus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available