4.5 Article

Oleic Acid Inhibits the KATP Channel Subunit Kir6.1 and the KATP Current in Human Umbilical Artery Smooth Muscle Cells

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES
Volume 346, Issue 3, Pages 204-210

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31826ba186

Keywords

Vascular smooth muscle cell; Oleic acid; K-ATP channel; Nitric oxide; PKC depressor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background:The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of various concentrations of oleic acid (OA) on K-ATP channel expression and the potential relationship to exogenous nitrogen monoxide and protein kinase C levels.Methods:Human umbilical artery smooth muscle cells (HUASMCs), between the 7th and 10th passages, were divided into control group, OA group (final OA concentration of 0, 50, 100 or 200 mol/L), nitric oxide (NO) intervention group, protein kinase C inhibitor group or GF-109203X (GFX) intervention group. Western immunoblotting was used to detect the protein expression of the K-ATP channel subunit Kir6.1. Also, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis to determine Kir6.1 messenger RNA levels and whole-cell patch clamping to measure K-ATP currents were performed.Results:The results suggested that OA inhibited Kir6.1 protein and messenger RNA expression in HUASMCs. Under a high concentration of potassium (140 mmol/L), 100 mol/L OA significantly reduced ATP-sensitive potassium current density, whereas a low extracellular concentration of potassium (5.4 mmol/L) did not influence K-ATP density. Pretreatment with either exogenous NO or GFX weakened the OA-induced inhibition of K-ATP in HUASMCs.Conclusions:The study demonstrated that OA inhibited Kir6.1, a K-ATP channel subunit, in HUASMCs, and indirectly inhibited the K-ATP current. In addition, the results indicated that NO and/or GFX partially reversed OA inhibition in HUASMCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available