4.5 Article

Functional Capacity and Muscular Abnormalities in Subclinical Hypothyroidism

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES
Volume 338, Issue 4, Pages 259-263

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181af7c7c

Keywords

Hypothyroidism; Neuromuscular signs and symptoms; Exercise tolerance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Neuromuscular abnormalities and low exercise tolerance are frequently observed in overt hypothyroidism, but it remains controversial if they can also occur in subclinical hypothyroidism (sHT). The aim of this study is to evaluate neuromuscular symptoms, muscle strength, and exercise capacity in sHT, compared with healthy euthyroid individuals. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed with 44 sHT and 24 euthyroid outpatients from a university hospital. Neuromuscular symptoms were questioned. Muscle strength was tested for neck, shoulder, arm, and hip muscle groups, using manual muscle testing (MMT). Quadriceps muscle strength was tested with a chair dynamometer and inspiratory muscle strength (IS) by a manuvacuometer. Functional capacity was estimated based oil the peak of oxygen uptake (mL/kg/min), using the Bruce treadmill protocol. Results: Cramps (54.8% versus 25.0% P < 0.05.), weakness (45.2% versus 12.6; P < 0.05), myalgia (47.6% versus 25.0%; P = 0.07) and altered MMT (30.8% versus 8.3%; P = 0.040) were more frequent in sHT. Quadriceps strength and IS were not impaired in sHT and the same was observed for functional capacity. IS was significantly lower in patients complaining of fatigue and weakness (P < 0.05) and tended to be lower in those with altered MMT (P = 0.090). Conclusion: Neuromuscular complaints and altered MMT were significantly more frequent in sHT than in controls, and IS was lower in patients with these abnormalities. Results Suggest that altered muscle strength by MMT and the coexistence of neuromuscular complaints in patients with sHT may indicate neuromuscular dysfunction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available