4.5 Article

Effects of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Hepatoblastoma: A Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 287-299

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181ce5f1e

Keywords

children; hepatocellular carcinoma; cholangiocarcinoma; beta-catenin; cytokeratin; hepatoblastoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection has become the mainstay in the treatment of hepatoblastoma (HB). The changes after chemotherapy typically result in tumor necrosis and a fibrohistiocytic response. We have observed that treated HBs undergo additional morphologic changes that have not been described. Herein, we report a 15-year retrospective study of HBs in 22 children who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to the Children's Oncology Group protocols. The medical records, diagnostic imaging, and histopathology were reviewed. Besides treated HBs having characteristic necrosis and fibrohistiocytic response, two-thirds had areas of cytoarchitectural differentiation (maturation'') mimicking non-neoplastic liver, and a quarter had alterations mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma. Nuclear expression of beta-catenin and keratin profiles were useful in distinguishing residual tumor with maturation'' from non-neoplastic liver and therefore in the assessment of surgical margins. Statistical analysis revealed that larger pretreatment and posttreatment imaged tumor size, larger tumor size at pathologic examination, and vascular invasion were significant univariate predictors of metastatic disease, whereas pretreatment imaged tumor size and vascular invasion were also significant independent predictors (multivariate logistic regression analysis). Multifocality, greater posttreatment necrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma-like morphology were more \often associated with metastatic disease, but did not reach statistical significance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available