4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Polymorphisms in the nitric oxide synthase 1 gene are associated with severe chronic rhinosinusitis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages E49-E54

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3588

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Nitric oxide (NO), is a biological messenger molecule and a component of innate immunity, with important roles in the regulation of inflammation and in defense against bacterial biofilms. Polymorphisms in genes regulating NO production have the potential for a role in the development of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The purpose of this study was to determine whether polymorphisms in genes regulating NO synthesis are associated with CRS. Methods: An established population of 206 individuals with severe CRS and 196 postal code-matched controls was previously screened using a pooling genome-wide associations study to estimate allelic frequency. Genes regulating NO synthesis with a maximal probability of association were identified. High-probability single nucleotide polymorphisms SNPs from the NO synthase (NOS1) and its ligand NOS1 adaptor protein (NOS1AP) genes were retained for individual genotyping. PLINK software was used to determine association. Results: Sixteen SNPs were genotyped successfully with a genotype distribution in agreement with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Two SNPs for NOS1 (rs1483757 and rs9658281) were significantly associated with CRS, with a protective effect. The severe subphenotype showed stronger associations. Subgroup analysis for the presence of nasal polyps, origin, and gender did not influence strength of associations. Conclusion: These data suggest that polymorphisms in the NOS1 gene may play a role in the susceptibility to develop CRS. Study findings apply to patients with severe CRS, unresponsive to surgery. (Am J Rhinol Allergy 25, e49-e54, 2011; doi:10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3588)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available