4.4 Article

Bacterial Modulation of Human Fetal Membrane Toll-like Receptor Expression

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages 33-40

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aji.12016

Keywords

Bacteria; chorioamnion; infection; preterm birth; Toll-like receptor

Funding

  1. NIH/NICHD [RO1HD049446, PO1HD054713]
  2. NIH [R03HD067446]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Problem Preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes (pPROM) occurs in 3040% of spontaneous preterm births (PTB) and is associated with intra-amniotic infection and inflammation. The membranes may sense and respond to microbes via Toll-like receptors (TLRs); however, little is known about their expression and regulation in this tissue. The objective of this study was to evaluate the expression of TLRs 110 in fetal membranes after exposure to pathogens associated with intra-amniotic infection and PTB. Method of study Normal human term fetal membrane explants were exposed to various bacteria. After 24 hrs, RNA was extracted and quantitative RT-PCR performed for TLRs110. Results Treatment of fetal membranes with Mycoplasma hominis increased expression of TLR4, TLR6, and TLR8 mRNA. Ureaplasma parvum upregulated TLR8 mRNA, and Porphyromonas gingivalis significantly increased fetal membrane TLR7 expression. In contrast, treatment with Gram-negative Escherichia coli (and its cell wall component lipopolysaccharide) downregulated TLR10 mRNA. No effect was detected for Ureaplasma urealyticum, Gardnerella vaginalis, or Group B Streptococcus. Conclusion These findings demonstrate that different types of bacteria have distinct effects on fetal membrane TLR expression patterns. Moreover, these findings highlight the disparity of fetal membrane responses to infection and thus suggest heterogeneity in the mechanisms by which infection-associated pregnancy complications, such as pPROM and PTB, arise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available