4.6 Article

Childhood Maltreatment Predicts Poor Economic and Educational Outcomes in the Transition to Adulthood

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 108, Issue 9, Pages 1142-1147

Publisher

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304587

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council (United Kingdom Medical Research Council grant) [G1002190]
  2. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [HD077482]
  3. Jacobs Foundation
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  5. Jacobs Foundation Fellowship
  6. MQ: Transforming Mental Health charity [MQ14F40]
  7. ESRC [ES/P010113/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. MRC [G1002190] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. To test whether childhood maltreatment was a predictor of (1) having low educational qualifications and (2) not being in education, employment, or training among young adults in the United Kingdom today. Methods. Participants were from the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study, a nationally representative UK cohort of 2232 twins born in 1994 to 1995. Mothers reported on child maltreatment when participants were aged 5, 7, 10, and 12 years. Participants were interviewed about their vocational status at age 18 years. Results. The unadjusted odds of having low educational qualifications or of not being in education, employment, or training at age 18 years were more than 2 times greater for young people with a childhood history of maltreatment versus those without. These associations were reduced after adjustments for individual and family characteristics. Youths who reported having a supportive adult in their lives had better education outcomes than did youths who had less support. Conclusions. Closer collaboration between the child welfare and education systems is warranted to improve vocational outcomes for maltreated youths.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available