4.3 Editorial Material

Being Human and Doing Primatology: National, Socioeconomic, and Ethnic Influences on Primatological Practice

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages 233-237

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20849

Keywords

nationality; ethnicity; cultural schema; bonds; Primatology

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The emerging manifesto, center of the essay collection this commentary is part of, points out that primatology is a primate's science and field of endeavor. It is about primates, and constructed and carried out by primates. But the relationships between different primates involved in primatology cannot be described merely as scientific, zoological, or conservatory. A main point emerging from this perspective is that the relationships amongst primates (as scientists and as subjects) are affected by primatologists' experiences outside of academic science and within the cultural schema that we acquire as members of human societies. My contribution focuses on the primatologists and their sometimes discussed, but too often ignored, cultural and ethnic contexts as influences on how they study, think about, and interact with other primates. In our views and bonds with other primates, do national, class, and ethnic factors count? Am. J. Primatol. 73:233-237, 2011. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available