4.6 Article

Benchmark modeling of the Sleipner CO2 plume: Calibration to seismic data for the uppermost layer and model sensitivity analysis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages 233-246

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.12.016

Keywords

Sleipner; Multiphase flow; CO2 plume; CCUS; Utsira; Sequestration

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FE0004381]
  2. Norwegian Center of Excellence Subsurface CO2 storage - Critical Elements and Superior Strategy (SUCCESS)
  3. agency of the United States Government
  4. Computer Modeling Group
  5. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An important question for the Carbon Capture, Storage, and Utility program is can we adequately predict the CO2 plume migration? The Sleipner project in the Norwegian North Sea provides more time-lapse seismic monitoring data than any other sites for tracking CO2 plume development, but significant uncertainties still exist for some reservoir parameters. In order to simulate CO2 plume migration and assess model uncertainties, we applied two multi-phase compositional simulators to the Sleipner Benchmark model for the uppermost layer (Layer 9) of the Utsira Sand and calibrated our model against the time-lapsed seismic monitoring data at the site from 1999 to 2010. Approximate match with the observed plume was achieved by introducing lateral permeability anisotropy, CH4 in the CO2 stream, and adjusting reservoir temperatures. Model-predicted gas saturation, thickness of the CO2 accumulation, and CO2 solubility in brine - none of them used as calibration metrics - were all comparable with interpretations of the seismic data in the literature. Hundreds of simulations of parameter sensitivity (pressure, temperature, feeders, spill rates, relative permeability curves, and CH4) showed that simulated plume extents are sensitive to permeability anisotropy, temperature, and CH4 but not sensitive to the other analyzed parameters. However, adjusting a single parameter within the reported range of values would not reproduce the north-south trending CO2 plume. It took a combination of permeability, CH4, and temperature adjustments to match simulated CO2 plume with seismic monitoring data. On the other hand, even with a range of uncertain modeling parameters, the predicted fate of CO2 fell within a narrow band, similar to 93 +/- 2% structural/hydrodynamic trapping and similar to 7 +/- 2% solubility trapping. The calibrated model is not unique. Other possibilities for reproducing the elongated plume such as a slight tilting of the caprock surface to the south and subtle geological features in the Layer 9 were not experimented with in this study, but are worthy of exploration for future studies. While it appears that we were able to reproduce the north-south elongated CO2 plume, which is a modest improvement over previous models, the adjustments of parameters need to be verified with new observations. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available